Gmail Calendar Documents Web Reader more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
ruby-talk-google
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
MiniTest & Test::Unit::TestResult in Ruby 1.9.1
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
James Mead  
View profile  
 More options Jan 28 2009, 11:17 am
From: James Mead <jamesmea...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:17:10 +0900
Local: Wed, Jan 28 2009 11:17 am
Subject: MiniTest & Test::Unit::TestResult in Ruby 1.9.1
Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

It looks like Test::Unit::TestResult [1] has disappeared in Ruby 1.9.1. Is
this correct?

In fact, it looks like requiring 'test/unit' now just gets you a thin
wrapper around MiniTest. Is this correct?

In Mocha's acceptance tests we currently use Test::Unit to run tests within
tests [2] and Test::Result gives us access to the errors and failures that
occurred within the inner test. This gives us clean looking tests like
ParameterMatcherTest [3].
--
James.
http://blog.floehopper.org

[1] http://is.gd/hwZb
[2] http://is.gd/hwYM
[3] http://is.gd/hx14


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James Gray  
View profile  
 More options Jan 28 2009, 11:38 am
From: James Gray <ja...@grayproductions.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:38:53 +0900
Local: Wed, Jan 28 2009 11:38 am
Subject: Re: MiniTest & Test::Unit::TestResult in Ruby 1.9.1
Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:17 AM, James Mead wrote:

> It looks like Test::Unit::TestResult [1] has disappeared in Ruby  
> 1.9.1. Is
> this correct?

> In fact, it looks like requiring 'test/unit' now just gets you a thin
> wrapper around MiniTest. Is this correct?

This is correct.  Test::Unit has been retired.

James Edward Gray II


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Trans  
View profile  
 More options Jan 28 2009, 3:54 pm
From: Trans <transf...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:54:59 +0900
Local: Wed, Jan 28 2009 3:54 pm
Subject: Re: MiniTest & Test::Unit::TestResult in Ruby 1.9.1
Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Jan 28, 10:38 am, James Gray <ja...@grayproductions.net> wrote:

> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:17 AM, James Mead wrote:

> > It looks like Test::Unit::TestResult [1] has disappeared in Ruby  
> > 1.9.1. Is
> > this correct?

> > In fact, it looks like requiring 'test/unit' now just gets you a thin
> > wrapper around MiniTest. Is this correct?

> This is correct.  Test::Unit has been retired.

Retired? I beleive it is still an active project, only it is now a
separate install.

T.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James Gray  
View profile  
 More options Jan 28 2009, 3:57 pm
From: James Gray <ja...@grayproductions.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:57:44 +0900
Local: Wed, Jan 28 2009 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: MiniTest & Test::Unit::TestResult in Ruby 1.9.1
Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Trans wrote:

> On Jan 28, 10:38 am, James Gray <ja...@grayproductions.net> wrote:
>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:17 AM, James Mead wrote:

>>> It looks like Test::Unit::TestResult [1] has disappeared in Ruby
>>> 1.9.1. Is
>>> this correct?

>>> In fact, it looks like requiring 'test/unit' now just gets you a  
>>> thin
>>> wrapper around MiniTest. Is this correct?

>> This is correct.  Test::Unit has been retired.

> Retired? I beleive it is still an active project, only it is now a
> separate install.

Yeah, my bad.  I should have said it has been retired as a standard  
library.

James Edward Gray II


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google