> >In article <0hpbr4pii7a2i0jbauut6a1d3mr6s43...@4ax.com>,
> > David Johnston <da...@block.net> wrote:

> >> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:48:35 -0400, Thanatos <atro...@mac.com> wrote:

> >> >In article <v2fbr45gfnrcsm0asp5g7dgm53jiqaj...@4ax.com>,
> >> > David Johnston <da...@block.net> wrote:

> >> >> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:49:10 -0400, Thanatos <atro...@mac.com> wrote:

> >> >> >A perfect example is the Reverend Wright issue. That wasn't
> >> >> >substance-less innuendo at all. Obama himself went on national TV and
> >> >> >admitted that Wright's comments were inappropriate and divisive. It
> >> >> >was
> >> >> >a huge news story and a significant part of the campaign. Yet try and
> >> >> >even mention Wright on Obama's Wikipedia page and it gets deleted
> >> >> >instantly.

> >> >> Before writing that, did the thought ever cross your mind that it
> >> >> might be an idea to check the wikipedia entry and see whether Wright
> >> >> is mentioned in it?  I did.  He was.  

> >> >It wasn't as of yesterday when this story came out.

> >> Before writing that, did the thought ever cross your mind to check the
> >> page history for the entry to see whether the claim you were making
> >> was true?  I did.  You can do it too.  The reference to Reverend
> >> Wright was there yesterday.    

> >LOL! So this is what you're talking about:

> >"Obama resigned from Trinity during the Presidential campaign after
> >controversial statements made by Rev. Jeremiah Wright became public."

> >Leaving aside how one can "resign" from a church in which one is not
> >employed, there's nothing there about the statements, nothing about the
> >credibility issues surrounding Obama's claims of how long he attended

> If you didn't mean "mention" you should have used another word.