> >I think it would be in Mr. Obama's self interest and that of the USA > > if he started to run the country instead of Nancy Pelosi.
> Over 4000 earmarks were added by repubs.
Actually the Democrats gave 40 % of the boondoggle to the Republicans as part of their good ole boys club membership ... The Republicans added nothing ... they were given that amount ... In fairness ... when the Republicans were in charge ... they did the same ... at a significant smaller amount though ...
> > >I think it would be in Mr. Obama's self interest and that of the USA > > > if he started to run the country instead of Nancy Pelosi.
> > Over 4000 earmarks were added by repubs.
> Actually the Democrats gave 40 % of the boondoggle to the Republicans > as part of their good ole boys club membership ... > The Republicans added nothing ... they were given that amount ... > In fairness ... when the Republicans were in charge ... they did the > same ... at a significant smaller amount though ...
If Obama hadn't signed the bill which was leftover from the Bush administration, the government would have closed down. He really had to sign it and move on.
Secular Human wrote: > On Mar 12, 10:26 am, number6 <snumb...@aol.com> wrote: >> On Mar 12, 1:42 am, "Reverend Billy Bob" <sku...@limbaugh.net> wrote:
>>> "DanubeRiver" <rhinefront...@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:46c5a17f-d653-4a2d-9e55-190f076d06ad@d2g2000pra.googlegroups.com... >>>> I think it would be in Mr. Obama's self interest and that of the USA >>>> if he started to run the country instead of Nancy Pelosi. >>> Over 4000 earmarks were added by repubs. >> Actually the Democrats gave 40 % of the boondoggle to the Republicans >> as part of their good ole boys club membership ... >> The Republicans added nothing ... they were given that amount ... >> In fairness ... when the Republicans were in charge ... they did the >> same ... at a significant smaller amount though ...
> If Obama hadn't signed the bill which was leftover from the Bush > administration, the government would have closed down. He really had > to sign it and move on.
at least that's what those white folks told him to say.
> > Actually the Democrats gave 40 % of the boondoggle to the Republicans > > as part of their good ole boys club membership ... > > The Republicans added nothing ... they were given that amount ... > > In fairness ... when the Republicans were in charge ... they did the > > same ... at a significant smaller amount though ...
> If Obama hadn't signed the bill which was leftover from the Bush > administration, the government would have closed down. He really had > to sign it and move on.
NO he didn't. They already had a continuation bill in the wings ready to go that did a straight flat funding of existing programs as is, no adds, no earmarks, in order to keep the government operating.
> Secular Human wrote: >> If Obama hadn't signed the bill which was leftover from the Bush >> administration, the government would have closed down. He really had >> to sign it and move on.
> at least that's what those white folks told him to say.
What is the source of your racism?
-- JG, former Quarterback and Lt. General SWIFT (Socialist Workers Infiltrating Federal Targets)
>> Secular Human wrote: >>> If Obama hadn't signed the bill which was leftover from the Bush >>> administration, the government would have closed down. He really had >>> to sign it and move on. >> at least that's what those white folks told him to say.
Let me suggest that it is a two part problem, not a one part problem. Earmarks are an issue because the government is spending money they do not have. Every dime of "unnecessary" spending, when you are running deficits, are being paid for by someone else. On the other hand, "if" they balanced the budget, then every cent of "unnecessary" spending means they cannot spend it somewhere else, which may be more important.
Igor wrote: > On Mar 12, 1:13 am, DanubeRiver <rhinefront...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think it would be in Mr. Obama's self interest and that of the USA >> if he started to run the country instead of Nancy Pelosi.
> If they'd just give him back that line item veto that they took away > from Clinton, there'd be no problem.
> DanubeRiver wrote: > > I think it would be in Mr. Obama's self interest and that of the USA > > if he started to run the country instead of Nancy Pelosi.
> he was referring to the marks his greasy ears make when he tries to > squeeze that big head through the window at the White House. Those > earmarks.
___________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________ Watch out Google will only allow you to say horrible things about Bush: Obama is off limits, they may cancel your account.
> DanubeRiver wrote: > > I think it would be in Mr. Obama's self interest and that of the USA > > if he started to run the country instead of Nancy Pelosi.
> he was referring to the marks his greasy ears make when he tries to > squeeze that big head through the window at the White House. Those > earmarks.
That I don't believe. Is this bill transparent? He signed it in a closed room. Let's see what is in this bill. I heard Madoff's charities got $1Billion. That's recent stuff. There's plenty of people out here who don't mind going line by line.
>>> Secular Human wrote: >>>> If Obama hadn't signed the bill which was leftover from the Bush >>>> administration, the government would have closed down. He really had >>>> to sign it and move on. >>> at least that's what those white folks told him to say.
>> What is the source of your racism?
> so u think white folks didn't tell him?
Why did you avoid my question?
-- JG, former Quarterback and Lt. General SWIFT (Socialist Workers Infiltrating Federal Targets)
> Igor wrote: >> On Mar 12, 1:13 am, DanubeRiver <rhinefront...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think it would be in Mr. Obama's self interest and that of the USA >>> if he started to run the country instead of Nancy Pelosi.
>> If they'd just give him back that line item veto that they took away >> from Clinton, there'd be no problem.
> never wuz a line item veto. unconstitutional.
Damn, but you're illiterate! Do they even wear shoes where you live, hillbilly?
-- JG, former Quarterback and Lt. General SWIFT (Socialist Workers Infiltrating Federal Targets)
>>>> Secular Human wrote: >>>>> If Obama hadn't signed the bill which was leftover from the Bush >>>>> administration, the government would have closed down. He really had >>>>> to sign it and move on. >>>> at least that's what those white folks told him to say. >>> What is the source of your racism?
>> so u think white folks didn't tell him?
> Why did you avoid my question?
you responded to my point with an irrelevant question. you are avoiding my point. why? because you know it is the truth.
>> Igor wrote: >>> On Mar 12, 1:13 am, DanubeRiver <rhinefront...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I think it would be in Mr. Obama's self interest and that of the USA >>>> if he started to run the country instead of Nancy Pelosi. >>> If they'd just give him back that line item veto that they took away >>> from Clinton, there'd be no problem.
>> never wuz a line item veto. unconstitutional.
> Damn, but you're illiterate! Do they even wear shoes where you live, > hillbilly?
> > > >I think it would be in Mr. Obama's self interest and that of the USA > > > > if he started to run the country instead of Nancy Pelosi.
> > > Over 4000 earmarks were added by repubs.
> > Actually the Democrats gave 40 % of the boondoggle to the Republicans > > as part of their good ole boys club membership ... > > The Republicans added nothing ... they were given that amount ... > > In fairness ... when the Republicans were in charge ... they did the > > same ... at a significant smaller amount though ...
> If Obama hadn't signed the bill which was leftover from the Bush > administration, the government would have closed down. He really had > to sign it and move on.
"Absolutely, we need earmark reform. And when I'm president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely." Sen. Barack Obama, D-IL, Sept 26, 2008
Obama is the leader of the Democrat party. This bill was crafted by his party, introduced in Congress under his watch. Yet, he couldn't stand up to his own party and keep his campaign promise.
Not only did Obama LIE, he has proven that he is not a leader.
On Mar 12, 12:14 pm, efeatherston <efeatherst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Actually the Democrats gave 40 % of the boondoggle to the Republicans > > > as part of their good ole boys club membership ... > > > The Republicans added nothing ... they were given that amount ... > > > In fairness ... when the Republicans were in charge ... they did the > > > same ... at a significant smaller amount though ...
> > If Obama hadn't signed the bill which was leftover from the Bush > > administration, the government would have closed down. He really had > > to sign it and move on.
> NO he didn't. They already had a continuation bill in the wings ready > to go that did a straight flat funding of existing programs as is, no > adds, no earmarks, in order to keep the government operating.
Please don't confuse the Obama apologist with the truth.
> > DanubeRiver wrote: > > > I think it would be in Mr. Obama's self interest and that of the USA > > > if he started to run the country instead of Nancy Pelosi.
> > he was referring to the marks his greasy ears make when he tries to > > squeeze that big head through the window at the White House. Those > > earmarks.
> That I don't believe. Is this bill transparent? He signed it in a > closed room. Let's see what is in this bill. I heard Madoff's > charities got $1Billion. That's recent stuff. There's plenty of > people out here who don't mind going line by line.
"Sunlight Before Signing: Too often bills are rushed through Congress and to the president before the public has the opportunity to review them. As president, Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.
Of course, Obama lies. This promise has already been broken twice. First it was the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, and second was the State Children's Health Insurance Program.
|
