Gmail Calendar Documents Web Reader more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
CNBC Would Rather Be Talked About Than Right
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Twitchell  
View profile  
 More options Mar 9 2009, 2:07 pm
Newsgroups: alt.gossip.celebrities
From: Twitchell <Twitchell_mem...@newsguy.com>
Date: 9 Mar 2009 11:07:01 -0700
Local: Mon, Mar 9 2009 2:07 pm
Subject: CNBC Would Rather Be Talked About Than Right
http://gawker.com/5166645/cnbc-would-rather-be-talked-about-than-right

CNBC is on fire! Just like the economy. After being lambasted for being
catastrophically wrong about everything its anchors and reporters are paid to
understand, the business network is actually enjoying its notoriety.

Jon Stewart and the White House have both put the business network squarely in
their sights for emerging as the spokesnetwork of choice for reactionary moneyed
interest, but the New York Time's Brian Stelter and Tim Arango report this
morning that "The headlines about CNBC are a testament to its relevance."

Which is true in the same sense that the headlines about Enron in 2001 were a
testament to that company's relevance. It's the reality-TV theory of publicity;
as long as people are talking about you, it doesn't matter what they are saying.
In CNBC's case, they're saying that the network was too busy ignoring Maria
Bartiromo's overnight flights with Citigroup CEO Sandy Weil to catch on to the
fact that Citigroup spent that last eight or so years buying up worthless assets
and hurtling toward insolvency. But it's OK as long as your formerly
cocaine-addicted anchor Larry Kudlow is considering a Senate run based on the
premise that rich people need an advocate in these tough times.

The angry outbursts from Cramer, Kudlow, et. al. are by design, Stelter and
Arango report, and for the time being they have been working: Ratings are up 7
percent for the first two months of the year, and CNBC's audience of well-heeled
CFOs continues to command high advertising rates. One knowledgable TV source
tells Gawker that CNBC rakes in as much money as the Today Show, which pulls in
a reported $250 million in annual profit. Still, CNBC suffers terribly during
downturns as amateur investors switch over to Judge Judy rather than watch their
retirement accounts spiral downward. The early '09 viewership has been goosed by
the market roller-coaster ride; as the recession settles in it will clearly drop
off.

But Cramer has a solution! "To attract viewers," the Times writes, "[Cramer]
said he would continue to make Mad Money entertaining, and that means more
predictions, even when they can be used against him by comedians like Mr.
Stewart later."

"If I get gushy, then I'm not going to be relevant," Cramer said. Lesson
learned.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google